Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
a personal attack from an anon account is attacking someone who can't strike back extremely uncourageous and lame in the same category as hitting someone who's defenseless I'm very supportive of all the anon projects in general but to be interesting they need credibility (otherwise it's just 4chan on Farcaster which isn't going to be interesting to most people) and to credibility they can't be used for cowardly purposes if you are using anonymity to critique you should be more gracious not less given you've opted to take your skin out of the game
4 replies
4 recasts
32 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Using an anon account in the first place is uncourageous and lame** FTFY
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
“I’m very supportive of all the anon projects BUT…” has the same energy as folks who say “I’m very supportive of freedom of speech BUT…” There are strict no-gos (e.g. threats of/inciting violence, underage pron etc…) but this puritanical softness is soft oppression through and through and extremely corny in the age of the internet
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NotFloris 🫂
@notfloris
I don’t get this gate keeping behavior. If there’s truth to the critique, why does it matter if it’s an anon or known person… I’m not privy to the drama behind this whole convo, but ‘bravery in criticizing’ seems like dismissing the feedback, just because someone doesn’t want to become the center of potential retaliation. What’s the drama about?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jd 🌺
@jdl
well said sailor
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
