Metamask is an awful experience, I don't understand why anyone tolerates this

Catch me on X, notifications are off here 
@devinjelliot

If I ever add support for MM it will be because there are dev specific functions and it will be a dev related route, otherwise just no

I'm right there with you, and attempting to solve it. first for devs, then for general users

Developer | Auditor | Building Iron Wallet

I will absolutely dig into this later today. I’d love to connect at some point and learn more about your overall direction. I have critical dependencies on connecting accounts with coherent ux and none of my users are expected to be crypto savvy nor crypto curious

I'm right there with you, and attempting to solve it. first for devs, then for general users

https://github.com/iron-wallet/iron

Lyricist 🎤🎶 • Visionary 👁️ • Synthesizer 🧠

Sharing lucid thoughts at the intersection of culture & the cutting edge.

I’m biased towards our wallet but it’s only wc2.0 and fwiw i still consider it in alpha with the beta currently under development 

The wc2.0 choice has certainly limited its range so you can’t get necessarily get everywhere in crypto land like you can with MM

I’ve still been using MetaMask just because that’s where my first wallet was created, and I suppose I fell victim to the brand positioning… what might I be missing out on by not considering other options?

Do you currently have better wallets to recommend, & why might you say they are better for the average user?

I’d argue that amounts to a false pmf unless the TAM being aimed at is equivalent to a small high school

goes to show how low the bar is for PMF in crypto yet 99% are unable to attain.

Ser try out Obvious wallet. In my experience it is a 10x difference when compared with metamask 

Obvious.technology

what is the best browser extension alternative?