How would you design a governance system that allows people to pay for the policies they want (direct bribery) but doesn't become a plutocracy (where only the rich have a voice)?

Founder of MotherDAO. Talking about coordination failure, governance problems and solutions, network states and DAOs.

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

@afurmanczyk.eth 
https://mirror.xyz/afurmanczyk.eth/rOjBuyNsvM3wd07Wm0WW0dqc6R-QHDhcYf39FxpmVQQ

This article was written by Andrew from @afurmanczyk.eth !

it's good. I think it's right. Obviously we want governance based on outcomes, but the problem with governance based on outcomes is that it's difficult to measure outcomes.

Or, another way to say this is that you need another governance system to govern the outcome measuring process, and how should that one work?

Haha thanks! I've been also thinking about this problem for a really long time, maybe we should chat would love to hear about your approach

Yep the "Outcome" part of it is just the consensus mechanism for the voters. There are several systems that operate together to deliver the whole package.  

It's impressive that for just being introduced to the idea you already identified some of the things you need to account for.