How would you design a governance system that allows people to pay for the policies they want (direct bribery) but doesn't become a plutocracy (where only the rich have a voice)?

Founder of MotherDAO. Talking about coordination failure, governance problems and solutions, network states and DAOs.

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

@afurmanczyk.eth 
https://mirror.xyz/afurmanczyk.eth/rOjBuyNsvM3wd07Wm0WW0dqc6R-QHDhcYf39FxpmVQQ

This article was written by Andrew from @afurmanczyk.eth !

Plus, depending on how it's implemented, outcome based governance is susceptible to shortermism

it's good. I think it's right. Obviously we want governance based on outcomes, but the problem with governance based on outcomes is that it's difficult to measure outcomes.

Or, another way to say this is that you need another governance system to govern the outcome measuring process, and how should that one work?