Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/negationgame
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
https://paragraph.com/@ngi/capital
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Especially like the ending. Always was… As many of the actors roles are changed it becomes difficult to name them. An investor as a customer as a promoter as an adjacent builder etc Wondering if you’ve landed on any new terms to describe the actors.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
yeah interesting question, so far they're just called contributors or stakeholders I've also played with other terms. The key thing though is that contributors should get some upside in the ceration of the valuabel thing they've created
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
100 You might be interested in revnets. There appears to be a fledgling category of ‘revenue tokens’ projects align with some of what you’ve written. revnet.eth.sucks/memo
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Maybe revnets would like to experiment with /negationgame as their governance layer instead of using token voting
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
That’s an interesting idea. Revnet projects dont have any governance as it’s unchangeable once deployed a la bitcoin. That said the operator split & how to put it to work certainly could have a governance layer.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction