negationgame

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

Especially like the ending. Always was…

As many of the actors roles are changed it becomes difficult to name them. An investor as a customer as a promoter as an adjacent builder etc

Wondering if you’ve landed on any new terms to describe the actors.

Ethereum builder & people connector. Juicebox, Revnet, Defifa & Footy App

yeah interesting question, so far they're just called contributors or stakeholders

I've also played with other terms.

The key thing though is that contributors should get some upside in the ceration of the valuabel thing they've created

100

You might be interested in revnets. There appears to be a fledgling category of ‘revenue tokens’ projects align with some of what you’ve written. 

revnet.eth.sucks/memo

Maybe revnets would like to experiment with /negationgame as their governance layer instead of using token voting

That’s an interesting idea. Revnet projects dont have any governance as it’s unchangeable once deployed a la bitcoin. That said the operator split & how to put it to work certainly could have a governance layer.

It’s a set of rules that dictate how the issuance & redemption prices & operator split are set & change over time. 

These stages (think halving events) enable the deployer to dial in on incentives for network loyalty & longevity. 

There’s a bunch more but yes it’s a mint/burn with amm between the ceiling (issuance price) & floor (redemption price). Set rules enable collateralized loans & an operator split can be used to fund the mission.

I don't understand, is it just putting money into a pot to get a token, and then when you redeem the token for the money in the pot you don't quite get the whole redemption value?