Just a reminder that a great spam mitigation mechanism is the sender stakes the message, and the recipient has the option to slash and delete the stake 

Will repeat every time I get a spam message

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

Of course you want some spam to be taxed.

But for legitimate things you could carve out a special distinction that’s not slashable or that reduces the amount required as stake to be able to send

I couldn’t let this go and I thought of some examples where this wouldn’t work.  Legitimate business and government mail. People would probably en masse slash mail from the tax office. There have also been some invoices that I recently received from a business that had terrible service.

The amount was to low to warrant legal action, but I would definitely have slashed those.

You would slash someone for dming you if they disagree with you on something?

It’s effectively free to send messages that ppl are happy to receive

Just curious, doesn’t that exclude certain people from conversations on the basis of money?