After listening to the sam harris + pmarca AI risk chat, I was left a little mystified by some of the arguments pmarca made.

Screenshot of what seemed like important yet weak arguments

I think I agree with this thread's main criticisms

After listening to the sam harris + pmarca AI risk chat, I was left a little mystified by some of the arguments pmarca made.

Screenshot of what seemed like important yet weak arguments

I think I agree with this thread's main criticisms
https://twitter.com/liron/status/1679890530485014529?s=20

we shouldn’t be giving that essay intellectual credit. it’s propaganda

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

yeah... there's a certain irony to his dismissal of alignment on the grounds that "smart things will learn not to have countervailing incentives"...

we shouldn’t be giving that essay intellectual credit. it’s propaganda https://warpcast.com/molo/0xd6334b

will give this a listen, but intuitively I do have agree that humans being outcompeted in a microcosm does not generalize to a world that run by AI singularly designed to outcompete humans in a qualifiable way.