Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Follow up: what would a token-gated experience solve for you on Farcaster *today*?
40 replies
3 recasts
41 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
monetization outside the walls of warpcast
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Example of a channel that would immediately benefit from this today? What type of content is getting created there that doesn't exist on Farcaster today? Why not maximize reach? Why not use another tool for exclusive content?
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
read could still be free and open, write could require a token. every single channel w/ a dedicated host would benefit from this today. the one thing we all want is qdau. the lack of economic levers hamstrings our ability to obtain it
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
recent growth of /degen is a good example of what channels + economic upside can achieve. sfaik that was the first time fc was being widely and rapidly shared on other networks. what happens when *every* channel can do that?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
Not to mention enabling channel hosts to have registrations for most active users.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

pgpg pfp
pgpg
@pgpg.eth
This sorta matches this idea I just posted about of app sponsored accounts. Where perhaps apps can onboard users to a specific channel. They could then check whatever conditions they want to do that (NFT, existing in database, having a valid national ID, whatever)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction