phil
@phil
I love to see the continued adoption of L2s, especially open-source ecosystems like the OP stack However, until we solve the UX of bridging we’re not going to see the significant adoption needed to drive the next wave I refuse to hold 42 different types of ETH and the cognitive overhead that comes with it
9 replies
7 recasts
42 reactions
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
had the same thought. isn’t this solved by native L2 tokens tho? instead of fiat to eth to L2 token, you can go fiat directly to L2 token if no L2 token i definitely agree: bridge requirement *increases* barrier to entry
3 replies
1 recast
1 reaction
tomu
@tomu
In your opinion, what is the main reason for the L2 token? The "network tokens" are not working as intended. If it's governance, less than 1% of people are active. In a PoS system, few people will stake for nodes.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
(my knowledge here is limited) my understanding is that L2 tokens are the network’s native medium of exchange. without it, you can’t transact. but maybe that’s wrong?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction