Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

nkemjika.eth pfp
nkemjika.eth
@nkemjika
Just learning that there is an ERC-223 standard that improves on ERC-20. But so far, I haven't seen a contract implementing ERC-223. Is there a reason why smart contract developers still stick with ERC-20? Casting here because i can't cast in /ethereum or /evm
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Louis 👵 🦇🔊 pfp
Louis 👵 🦇🔊
@superlouis.eth
ERC20 defines an interface, which is the bare minimum to be found, indexed, traded as a fungible token. 223 defines a behavior which could drastically limit the transferrability of your token. Token developers usually want to have the most liquid assets. For the transfer safety, OZ has a "SafeERC20" impl. Also, there's a debate whether it's a good idea to check if an address is a smart contract (there's no way to know if it will be a SC in the future). Also, I don't understand the reasoning behind the gas cost saving in this ERC.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
It might be due to comparability with all the other protocols and infra. Unless it’s directly backwards compatible with ERC-20 it’s likely not gonna take off; way too much money already put into the existing standard
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction