Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's a concrete example of where the proposed moderation model for channels: 1. More control over the main feed algo 2. Includes the existing concept of hosts 3. Expands the pool based on simple (hold an asset) and advanced (recipient of a successful Nouns proposal) onchain criteria 4. Less work :)
11 replies
4 recasts
129 reactions

Nick pfp
Nick
@nintynick.eth
Will onchain criteria be completely open?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Whatever your channel bot wants to do. :)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
so the programability/flexibility is achieved by custom bot controlling an FID that's been assigned ability to be a curator for the channel?
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
That's my understanding. Works only as well as the bot does. My worry is AM seems to have trouble scaling; on /degen side we routinely get spam in spite of the rules. Mayhaps this will be ironed out by launch.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Nick pfp
Nick
@nintynick.eth
what would perfect moderation look like?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
The perfect mod would be so perfect they could be trusted to also be not just the autoMod but also the autoTipper not just putting casts to the top of the feed but trusted to inflate the token supply too ;)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction