Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's a concrete example of where the proposed moderation model for channels: 1. More control over the main feed algo 2. Includes the existing concept of hosts 3. Expands the pool based on simple (hold an asset) and advanced (recipient of a successful Nouns proposal) onchain criteria 4. Less work :)
11 replies
4 recasts
132 reactions

nintynick.eth pfp
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
Will onchain criteria be completely open?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Whatever your channel bot wants to do. :)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
so the programability/flexibility is achieved by custom bot controlling an FID that's been assigned ability to be a curator for the channel?
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
That's my understanding. Works only as well as the bot does. My worry is AM seems to have trouble scaling; on /degen side we routinely get spam in spite of the rules. Mayhaps this will be ironed out by launch.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions