Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's a concrete example of where the proposed moderation model for channels: 1. More control over the main feed algo 2. Includes the existing concept of hosts 3. Expands the pool based on simple (hold an asset) and advanced (recipient of a successful Nouns proposal) onchain criteria 4. Less work :)
11 replies
8 recasts
72 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
(Logic in the example is illustrative. You can come up with whatever criteria you want.)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
czar
@czar
main feed immediately lends to the question, what is main... I thought for some time, but I dont have any suggestions on what to name it though...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nicholas
@nintynick.eth
Will onchain criteria be completely open?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mark ๐ฉ
@web3withmark
Could it be possible to see who has signed up to a particular service? So for example, users that have signed into my service will be boosted - usually itโs those who are asking for help or need attention the most.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Galen
@galen
@auryn would love to see Gnosis Guild governance tools extrapolated to Farcaster channels!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
.
@afl
This is a great direction. ๐๐ผ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dycp
@tn100x.eth
looks great. learning here ๐
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
leoclark.base.eth.โโจ-โจ๐ฉ
@leoclark.eth
Nice! โโจ-โจ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pochan.degen๐ฉ๐ต๐โ๏ธ
@pochan
I think it's a very good thing that we can be flexible and respond to the increasing number of participants and the emergence of new things.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sweven Mwah
@jholumolu
Great
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ethereum Daily ๐๏ธ
@rue1776
Really like this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
willywonka โโจ-โจ
@willywonka.eth
a future so bright, weโre gonna need โโจ-โจ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Marat
@marat116
Looks great, gotta try it ๐ช
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
