Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's a concrete example of where the proposed moderation model for channels: 1. More control over the main feed algo 2. Includes the existing concept of hosts 3. Expands the pool based on simple (hold an asset) and advanced (recipient of a successful Nouns proposal) onchain criteria 4. Less work :)
11 replies
4 recasts
132 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
(Logic in the example is illustrative. You can come up with whatever criteria you want.)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
Will onchain criteria be completely open?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
czar
@czar
main feed immediately lends to the question, what is main... I thought for some time, but I dont have any suggestions on what to name it though...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mark π©
@web3withmark
Could it be possible to see who has signed up to a particular service? So for example, users that have signed into my service will be boosted - usually itβs those who are asking for help or need attention the most.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
willywonka ββ¨-β¨ @devcon
@willywonka.eth
a future so bright, weβre gonna need ββ¨-β¨
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Galen @Gnosis π¦
@galen
@auryn would love to see Gnosis Guild governance tools extrapolated to Farcaster channels!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
.
@afl
This is a great direction. ππΌ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
leoclark.ββ¨-β¨ α½π©
@leoclark.eth
Nice! ββ¨-β¨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yusuff
@hysolac
$FCKN cool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rueπ½
@rue1776
Really like this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ππππΒΉα΅
@tn100x.eth
looks great. learning here π
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
