Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
two things can be true: 1. this is good revenue generation for these pods that wouldn’t have been generated on traditional platforms 2. as a podcaster, “minutes listened” is infinitely more valuable to me compared to “mints,” which imo is the most unreliable onchain metric for quality of multimedia content
19 replies
7 recasts
254 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
True enough, I mint probably 5x more podcasts than I actually listen to. I see a mint? I mint it. Low investment; FC makes it way easier. I see a podcast? takes a lot more for me to invest my time. FC makes podcasts hard since I can't listen in background. I have to go to YT, downcast or something else.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
so let’s assume only 20% of pod minters actually listen to the pod that means you actually need 5x distribution compared to web2 pods for brand deals and sponsorships to be worthwhile to the brand livestream attendance is a more accurate representation of distribution for multimedia content s/o @gmfarcaster
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
Feels like a mistake to equate minters with listeners as minters are a paying audience That audience pool (with a raw dollar value > $0 associated with them) is a complement to whatever distro you get from live listening parties or across other podcatcher apps
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
that is simply not how brand marketing works one could argue 100 people who show up to a livestream and generate content / discussion / conversation / connection as a result of the livestream is more valuable than 100 people who mint and say nothing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
yet I mint and don't listen, so I don't think I should be automatically considered "audience"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
