If Sony proactively communicated what they wanted to permission on their chain (eg no memecoins), would people have accepted that?

Was the bigger issue that memecoins were allowed to exist and then censored?

anyone out there have an opinion on permissioned L3s?

Half the chains in Cosmos are permissioned so there's a precedent. Their chain would've been DOA if everyone had to submit to Sony before deploying. I'm not sure if the risk of a sudden network wide rug via censorship is any better though. In a way it's more cruel to everyone.

Making DeFi accessible to everyone - building @starta | /9to5dotmeme on the side FID 675

I'd argue that this was the only way a permissioned chain could've launched with any meaningful activity/economy

What’s the best source of info for what actually happened? Did they always have the power to censor through the RPC layer and they decided to selectively using that power after some memecoins were deployed?

Yeah I think it launched with all of the tooling in place:

Yeah I think it launched with all of the tooling in place: https://docs.soneium.org/docs/ip-and-contracts-restriction

Interesting. I wonder if that was on their docs from genesis

Yeah if it was there they should have communicated it better upfront 

I don’t think anyone has the answers to those IP <> immutable contract questions lol

Well it’s definitely buried. Not easily searchable at all. I have so many questions about what “resolving” an IP violation on a possibly immutable contract would look like. 

Like if someone stored Spider-Man 2 on chain, what would happen?