Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
I’m starting to believe that context windows explain EVERYTHING about just about everything.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Nick pfp
Nick
@nickporter
thought about our convo yesterday while reading this — somewhat contradictory yet profoundly interesting. thought you might appreciate: https://apple.news/AYWvlocWdROKA_lXkL4JPlQ
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
Trouble is the ways of testing any of this is 0. Lots of issues.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nick pfp
Nick
@nickporter
maybe over the next decade (or two) we have the ability to in any case, all roads lead back at observation
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Metaphorical pfp
Metaphorical
@hyp
I feel like people keep going quantum so they can somehow believe in free will, but does randomness really provide it?!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nick pfp
Nick
@nickporter
i think, at least in the context of orch-OR, it differs from probabilistic randomness or algorithmic determinism in the sense that the underlying fabric of spacetime influences consciousness in other words, where we exist in spacetime dictates or influences the collapse of the wave function and concurrently there’s some planck scale fuckery on the part of gravity im not sold on anything necessarily but i find it an interesting rabbit hole to explore
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Nick pfp
Nick
@nickporter
i wonder what we’d look like to the tralfamadorians if we exist as wave functions as opposed to a deterministic existence
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction