Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
I’m starting to believe that context windows explain EVERYTHING about just about everything.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Nick
@nickporter
thought about our convo yesterday while reading this — somewhat contradictory yet profoundly interesting. thought you might appreciate: https://apple.news/AYWvlocWdROKA_lXkL4JPlQ
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
Trouble is the ways of testing any of this is 0. Lots of issues.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nick
@nickporter
maybe over the next decade (or two) we have the ability to in any case, all roads lead back at observation
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
I feel like people keep going quantum so they can somehow believe in free will, but does randomness really provide it?!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nick
@nickporter
i think, at least in the context of orch-OR, it differs from probabilistic randomness or algorithmic determinism in the sense that the underlying fabric of spacetime influences consciousness in other words, where we exist in spacetime dictates or influences the collapse of the wave function and concurrently there’s some planck scale fuckery on the part of gravity im not sold on anything necessarily but i find it an interesting rabbit hole to explore
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
Either way, still feels like they are looking for ways to find free will.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nick
@nickporter
what’s your stance or perspective on free will?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
I think it’s like motion. Is the train moving or the station? Depends whether you are on the train or in the station. Neither is wrong. From my perspective i have it, from the universe’s, not so much.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
