Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nick TomainošŸŽ© pfp
Nick TomainošŸŽ©
@nick
Understand this sentiment, gambling can be very bad when taken to the extreme. But when people with knowledge contribute by risking money in a market, more truth is revealed. This is great for humanity. The much darker alternative is a world where a few companies control perception with no accountability.
7 replies
2 recasts
30 reactions

Httpz pfp
Httpz
@httpz
Perhaps in that same vein it could also help spread misinformation in the face of mass adoption? If PMs are indeed the ā€˜killer appā€™, and if early on the zeitgeist is that ā€˜bets in prediction markets are more likely to be trueā€™ People/groups with more money than morals could fund helpful untruths
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nick TomainošŸŽ© pfp
Nick TomainošŸŽ©
@nick
People and groups with more money than morals are funding countless untruths now at no cost. If they throw their money at untruths in markets there is a cost. They lose their money.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

ā†‘langchain šŸŽ©  pfp
ā†‘langchain šŸŽ©
@langchain
Also in these markets at least participants could have a verifiable history of stances or actions theyā€™ve taken.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction