nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Am I the only one whose a little sketched out by letting apps other than Warpcast add/delete posts and change my profile? I get that it's the point but still..
8 replies
4 recasts
22 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
*who’s
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
I linked @flink fwiw
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kartik
@slokh
Definitely a valid concern. The main protection right now is that removing the signer will remove all messages sent by that signer for your fid. Seems good enough for now.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
I don’t really see what problems in my life could be created by anything a third party app could do here so I don’t ever think about it. Bad actors always show up at some point but that’s typically when it’s possible to create an advantage by being a bad actor
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Have you ever used a 3rd party Twitter client?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nalo
@nalo
wdym by "letting apps" add/delete posts and change profile? Isn't that just logging in to other clients and making manual user actions?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
woj
@woj.eth
oauth for google / facebook / twitter works exactly the same farcaster permissions could use some better granularity but it will come sooner or later @manan @rish
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Greg
@greg
I agree and have asked for scoped permissions a few times but understand why it's not a priority for the protocol team (most people don't notice or care, and nothing bad has happened yet)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
