nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
I would be the first person to pay attention to people with a couple verified web2 credentials on Farcaster, when parsing my replies. Use @eulerlagrange.eth Opacity to prove you have 3 related 2+ year old accounts on GH, X, Gmail etc to get a badge that I can perceive in my notifications & replies.
9 replies
1 recast
13 reactions
Jack Dishman
@dish
I feel like @icebreaker comes the closest to this
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
@j4ck.eth is there a cast action to see if a given fid is legit?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
yo - we don't have a cast action right now, although i like what @dish is doing ingesting our data and his cast actions we have been in talks with opacity & other zkTLS to get more web2 data into icebreaker what would you like to see to qualify someone as legit or not in the cast action response? immediately i think of a profile summary: - how many verified channels - how many credentials - maybe FID
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
first blush, i want opacity to invent a solution to link multiple web2 profiles to establish "same person different services" and then just use that to define humanity. bonus to incorporate web3 history but perhaps hard to know how real any of that is?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
i see – you don't need opacity for that, we do that on /icebreaker rn by letting you link 10+ web2 and web3 account types to your account, then letting you optionally equip them to your profile we don't assign a humanity score though, just let viewer decide if trusted or not. these can be equipped or hidden from your public profile we put a lot of weight on verified company email addresses that manifest as equippable attestations you can link accounts on icebreaker here: https://app.icebreaker.xyz/settings/linked-accounts
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
