It’s worth raising an eyebrow at this just because it affects many of us personally, but when one is honest they realize tech is not a very “dangerous class”. 

Not like … lawyers

It’s worth raising an eyebrow at this just because it affects many of us personally, but when one is honest they realize tech is not a very “dangerous class”. 

Not like … lawyers https://www.niskanencenter.org/are-we-overproducing-elites-and-instability/

Tech, creative, and marketing jobs among broad spiral of downwards pay as employers appear to be lowering salaries for new hires https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/careers/salary-deflation-workers-new-jobs-0b2e1a1f

In response to — I don’t know what happened, I hit recast

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

In response to — I don’t know what happened, I hit recast 

https://warpcast.com/leefang/0x100dfe17

I’d prefer an excess of lawyers to a tightly controlled group. While the extremes grow with the size of the group, it becomes more difficult to force a rapid shift in legal theory. 

So I would baselessly argue a large legal class increases stability of the rule of law.

But AI kinda circumvents that; if the layman depends on AI then in a scenario where AI is centralized and manipulated it could easily have the opposite effect.

I make rockets IRL.
I reserve the right to shamelessly recast for degen reasons. 
Soldier once upon a time.

AI will definitely collapse the legal field. I can’t pretend to know what that will look like. 

But a large pool of unemployed lawyers, who have a voice and depth of knowledge still seems better than a small pool of the same. From the standpoint of stability in a declining democracy, at least.

I think the hypothesis goes like 

The layman will depend on AI (side effects unknown) and the lawyers will be up to their eyeballs in law school debt with no job, at which point respect for the rule of law may diminish