Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
New idea for L2 voting: - With the coming Duncan upgrade, we'll be able to do proofs on L2 about L1 state, allowing voting - We can also do proofs on L1 about L2 state, because of the output oracle. Technically you're supposed to wait 7 days, but that's prob overkill 😀
4 replies
0 recast
23 reactions
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
You could accumulate votes on L2 and then batch vote for/against on L1 maybe? Would probably require delegate your Noun vote to the contract that allowed this. Would be easier if we had per Noun voting
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
I guess implementing per-noun voting would require a change in the governor's contract. While the voting pool approach seems to be more permissionless and feasible. 🤔
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
