Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
New idea for L2 voting: - With the coming Duncan upgrade, we'll be able to do proofs on L2 about L1 state, allowing voting - We can also do proofs on L1 about L2 state, because of the output oracle. Technically you're supposed to wait 7 days, but that's prob overkill 😀
4 replies
0 recast
32 reactions

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
You could accumulate votes on L2 and then batch vote for/against on L1 maybe? Would probably require delegate your Noun vote to the contract that allowed this. Would be easier if we had per Noun voting
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

isaac pfp
isaac
@zaak
what’s duncan? but this is intriguing cc @neokry
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

carlos juar.eth pfp
carlos juar.eth
@juar.eth
What are you thinking for doing proofs on L2 about L1 state? Some L2s have access to mainnets merkle tree, but not all afaik. Maybe there’s something about Dencun I’m missing. 4788 is great as an oracle, can’t wait playing with it 🤠
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

david pfp
david
@davidbr
Maybe moving propdates or candidates to L2 would be a good first POC. They currently read a small amount of state from L1.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction