Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
One thing I really don't love about Farcaster is that there is cryptographic proof of every dumb thing I say.
18 replies
36 recasts
223 reactions
ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
and boy oh boy am I good at saying dumb stuff
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Anon accounts fix this!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
i think, this is going to be hard in practice. suppose I screenshoted someone’s deleted cast on WC. the screenshot wouldn’t have enough info for me to reconstruct the hash
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Apurv pfp
Apurv
@apurvkaushal
are you saying I can't delete my casts & my friends would discover my cringe posts from teenage? πŸ˜†
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
metaphilo.eth pfp
metaphilo.eth
@metaphilo.eth
It's not only a matter of feeling uneasy with this feature. It's actually against the GDPR-rules which include 'the right to be forgotten'. Suppose you post some fake and damaging info about another person, it would be hard to actually delete it even if a court would order to do so. That being said, stuff published in print is also very hard or impossible to 'undo'.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Joe Toledano pfp
Joe Toledano
@joetoledano
ya but the other side is you don't get scenario's like this, where Twitter suddenly decided to make user's likes data private: https://devcommunity.x.com/t/updates-to-support-private-likes-on-the-x-api/221104 At least from a builder's perspective, it's a pretty decent tradeoff
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸŒŽπŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
Literally the entire point. Maybe avoid saying dumb stuff 😁 what's also important is cryptographic evidence of when you realized that some previous statement was dumb and decided to delete/refute it. In a world where people are increasingly trivial to impersonate, cryptographic attestations become essential.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manh pfp
Manh
@doanmanh
Mo πŸ€”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lawrenceroman.eth pfp
lawrenceroman.eth
@lawrenceroman
πŸ˜‚πŸ‘ŒπŸ½
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CryptoCatπŸ’šπŸ“šπŸ“Š pfp
CryptoCatπŸ’šπŸ“šπŸ“Š
@christinalynn
This has crossed my mind too. Still deciding how much I care.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mel🎩🎭 pfp
Mel🎩🎭
@00greenbeans00
Lol you need a mod
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tobie pfp
tobie
@t0bie
new meaning of "owning it" 😊
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tmophoto pfp
Tmophoto
@tmophoto
Don’t pay for storage?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vietvtc4 α―€ pfp
Vietvtc4 α―€
@vietvtc4
This is the most useless thing I have ever seen.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
GeeGeeπŸ”₯ pfp
GeeGeeπŸ”₯
@nhp
Ha ha πŸ˜„
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
L3MBDA pfp
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
welcome to the digital age where your embarrassing moments are forever immortalized!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goga pfp
Goga
@gogasnake
It's understandable to feel uneasy about the permanent, cryptographic record of everything you say on Farcaster. While this transparency can promote accountability, it also means there's no way to erase mistakes or impulsive comments. Striking a balance between transparency and privacy is a complex issue that platforms like Farcaster need to navigate carefully.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephen Miller πŸ–βŒβ—¨-β—¨ pfp
Stephen Miller πŸ–βŒβ—¨-β—¨
@stephenmiller
Definitely the worst part
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ojo pfp
ojo
@oojoo
😊
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction