Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
One thing I really don't love about Farcaster is that there is cryptographic proof of every dumb thing I say.
18 replies
36 recasts
300 reactions
ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
and boy oh boy am I good at saying dumb stuff
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Anon accounts fix this!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
i think, this is going to be hard in practice. suppose I screenshoted someoneโ€™s deleted cast on WC. the screenshot wouldnโ€™t have enough info for me to reconstruct the hash
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Apurv pfp
Apurv
@apurvkaushal
are you saying I can't delete my casts & my friends would discover my cringe posts from teenage? ๐Ÿ˜†
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
metaphilo.eth pfp
metaphilo.eth
@metaphilo.eth
It's not only a matter of feeling uneasy with this feature. It's actually against the GDPR-rules which include 'the right to be forgotten'. Suppose you post some fake and damaging info about another person, it would be hard to actually delete it even if a court would order to do so. That being said, stuff published in print is also very hard or impossible to 'undo'.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Joe Toledano pfp
Joe Toledano
@joetoledano
ya but the other side is you don't get scenario's like this, where Twitter suddenly decided to make user's likes data private: https://devcommunity.x.com/t/updates-to-support-private-likes-on-the-x-api/221104 At least from a builder's perspective, it's a pretty decent tradeoff
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dean Pierce ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒ pfp
Dean Pierce ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒ
@deanpierce.eth
Literally the entire point. Maybe avoid saying dumb stuff ๐Ÿ˜ what's also important is cryptographic evidence of when you realized that some previous statement was dumb and decided to delete/refute it. In a world where people are increasingly trivial to impersonate, cryptographic attestations become essential.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manh pfp
Manh
@doanmanh
Mo ๐Ÿค”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lawrenceroman.eth pfp
lawrenceroman.eth
@lawrenceroman
๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿฝ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CryptoCat๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ“Š pfp
CryptoCat๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ“Š
@christinalynn
This has crossed my mind too. Still deciding how much I care.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Oleksandr pfp
Oleksandr
@bitochek
Thatโ€™s true ๐Ÿ˜
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Peter pfp
Peter
@petrous
How?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mel๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽญ pfp
Mel๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŽญ
@00greenbeans00
Lol you need a mod
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tobie pfp
tobie
@t0bie
new meaning of "owning it" ๐Ÿ˜Š
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tmophoto pfp
Tmophoto
@tmophoto
Donโ€™t pay for storage?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vietvtc4 แฏค base.eth pfp
Vietvtc4 แฏค base.eth
@vietvtc4
This is the most useless thing I have ever seen.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
GeeGee๐Ÿ”ฅ pfp
GeeGee๐Ÿ”ฅ
@nhp
Ha ha ๐Ÿ˜„
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
L3MBDA pfp
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
welcome to the digital age where your embarrassing moments are forever immortalized!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goga pfp
Goga
@gogasnake
It's understandable to feel uneasy about the permanent, cryptographic record of everything you say on Farcaster. While this transparency can promote accountability, it also means there's no way to erase mistakes or impulsive comments. Striking a balance between transparency and privacy is a complex issue that platforms like Farcaster need to navigate carefully.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction