Hypothetical—if you were forced to go get a PhD in one of the following science fields, which would it be and why?

1. Physics
2. Chemistry
3. Biology

4. maths bc it's just an endless unproductive nerdsnipe and this is what life is about

what if math is actually the problem and our current mathematical frameworks are the limiting factor in solving contradictory theories in physics?

no single mathematical framework can capture all truths. this can lead us to dead ends of we can't find a new one.

customer support @supercast

trying to sound smart /doingnumbers

what if math is actually the problem and our current mathematical frameworks are the limiting factor in solving contradictory theories in physics?

no single mathematical framework can capture all truths. this can lead us to dead ends of we can't find a new one.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

/bettik founder /outercorps stalwart | ex-binance, ex-celsiusX

This implies that there is a God and a spirit realm. Not all of the world is logically reducible.

you know less than you think @purple gang 

These incompleteness theorems imply that there will never be a logical model that will be complete. No matter how much we know. 

By corollary this implies that logic can’t encompass all knowledge, and there *must* be something beyond logic to explain our existence.

I’m not sure how it implies that, but in terms of logic, logic is a function of neural patterns predictably interpreting stimulation, so if we’re talking about any part of the world that is perceptible (affects one’s nerves & brain), then it follows some logic by definition, even if we haven’t understood it yet