Content pfp
Content
@
https://veryinter.net/person
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Naomi  pfp
Naomi
@naomiii
"One problem with recommendations as the grist for the digital content mill is that there are only so many things to recommend. " Another great essay by Kyle Chayka https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/the-banality-of-online-recommendation-culture
3 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

_slow_crypto 🌅⏳🪁 pfp
_slow_crypto 🌅⏳🪁
@slowcrypto
I see you, recommending. A lot of words to make a simple point but an interesting point all the same.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

entter pfp
entter
@entter
50 $DEGEN ✨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Really enjoyed reading this, thanks for sharing. Lately, I’ve been thinking about "depth of taste" and the value of preserving things for those who seek them out, rather than diluting content and passion through mass recommendation culture that emphasizes visibility and scalability. This ties into Farcaster as well, where all casts are public by default. Im also curious about how to preserve content for those who truly seek it, without making them subscribe to another service. This line of thinking also seems to conflict with the interests of creators who rely on wide exposure. The middle ground that sounds most appealing to me is tiered visibility, which is what platforms like hearingthings.co seem to be doing. Substack and Paragraph also offer this, but I don’t have much insight into how well it’s working for creators on those platforms.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction