july

Working through a mental model rn

1. Good content is harder to make than bad or stolen content

2. Given a quantity incentive w/o quality penalty, bad content will always proliferate faster

3. Quality is group specific and really hard to measure

So until you know what your group loves, rewards accelerate bad actors?

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /creators and /cameron. dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

My take is that bad actors are unstoppable. People will always find a way to scam or farm, and a percent of other people will fall for it.

All we can do is curate our circle and reward the good actors we see. Encourage them and help them feel good; motivate them to keep creating and contributing.

Raise the tribe.

/fieldway: sufficiently decentralized team leadership.

CoinDesk Director of Product Management.

Casts are my own and don't represent anyone but me.

That makes sense. I probably would have replied differently in another channel.

I've thought through this a bit because we had a token-like system to promote engagement, and I've worked with other systems to promote content creation. I haven't yet seen anything more effective than tools to empower users to curate.

i appreciate the sentiment a lot, but i'm trying to build internet scale apps so i gotta try stuff to fix it 🫡🫡