To me, the biggest problem with "proof of human origin" is that "human-created" vs "AI-created" is a false binary. Most art and code I create involves many rounds of interaction between me and models. I suspect most interesting things made this decade will be like this

To me, the biggest problem with "proof of human origin" is that "human-created" vs "AI-created" is a false binary. Most art and code I create involves many rounds of interaction between me and models. I suspect most interesting things made this decade will be like this

https://x.com/trentmc0/status/1794333215290982702

I can't believe I'm about to say this to you of all people.... But I think what people actually want is proof of work 😛.

And by that I mean it feels better to reward humans who have put some amount of time into the content than to reward folks who ran a command in under a second, posted the result and moved on.

Musician and artist from the smallest largest city. https://audius.co/monist

I slightly disagree, advancement demands change, the ability to craft a  prompt and create a unique piece of art, writing, code or whatever you need is a skill worth rewarding. What should not be rewarded is low effort actions and creations, Human generated or AI assisted... That's my take

I am a poet, crypto enthusiast, web3 influencer and airdrop hunter, I love meeting people and trying out new opportunities. Kevinmfer #10

I think you and I are actually quite aligned. This is pretty much how I feel about it.