![Mk3691 pfp](https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/e815f8da-4338-4d96-81d3-5309e656eb00/rectcrop3)
Mk3691
@mk3691
3 replies
36 recasts
94 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
14 recasts
74 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
13 replies
40 recasts
136 reactions
3 replies
85 recasts
159 reactions
3 replies
2 recasts
11 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
3 replies
15 recasts
37 reactions
316 replies
152 recasts
849 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
45 replies
66 recasts
291 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
6 replies
35 recasts
120 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
I haven't commented about rollups in several months, if not over a year, so I'm just a casual observer now...
Native rollups are pretty cool, and what I meant by "enshrined zkEVM bridge" a couple of years ago (except they've got a wider scope than zkEVMs)
However, they are not "enshrined rollups", as I wrote about them at least, which are in-protocol, L1 rollups
Overarching thought on rollups: there simply has not been anywhere enough demand to saturate 1,000+ chains by 2025 like I had expected in 2021. Including all L1s and L2s, there's maybe like 10, at most. I'm sure demand will grow, but not to the magnitude anyone expected. It would be prudent to factor in this lower terminal demand in infrastructure designs, instead of just "build it they'll come" hopium.
https://x.com/apolynya/status/1629651981768990720 2 replies
108 recasts
216 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
3 recasts
16 reactions