mk pfp
mk
@mk
Not sure if soulbound tokens are a good idea, but I am certain it’s a terrible name.
14 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
degen #1 pfp
degen #1
@juan
Why are they not a good idea?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
makes perfect sense to me as an ex-WoW player :) but yeah maybe not great broadly
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
SBTs will be a massive category. It is how on-chain credentials will work, but I think it’s a lot more subjective and Lindy effect than it will be some super hard coded smart contract magic. Meaning SBTs will hold meaning if the “Soul” issuing them has value.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed O'Shaughnessy pfp
Ed O'Shaughnessy
@eddieosh
It's foretelling the future when the Great Reset takes our souls and we will be happy!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben - [C/x] pfp
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
@perl
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex Loukissas 🍉 pfp
Alex Loukissas 🍉
@futureartist
Name one crypto/web3 product name that’s good :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Corbin Page pfp
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
continuing the crypto sector tradition of terrible names: ICOs, smart contracts, DeFi, NFTs, etc etc... The funny part is that most of these things are powerful enough to overcome the terrible naming...perhaps it's a genius test of PMF 🤣 SBTs should be "Badges" imho
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dave Pazdan pfp
Dave Pazdan
@paz
yea account-bound tokens is a bit lighter
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brandon pfp
Brandon
@bvalosek
Role-bound tokens is a decent alternative
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul pfp
Rahul
@nanspro
I think they are def a good idea. A SBT can encapsulate your address’s past activity and can be used to access separate communities, undercollateralized lending, airdrop whitelisting, just flexing etc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nicksainato pfp
nicksainato
@nicksainato
SBT are a cool idea, but they need to remain easily burnable, and yes, it’s a very kitschy name
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liam Roberts pfp
Liam Roberts
@lmr
I think it implicitly over-estimates just how many use cases actually need to be tied to some form of verifiable identity. I am pretty happy to lurk on most parts of the internet without some confirmation that I am socially recognised as who I say I am.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Avi pfp
Avi
@avimeyers
lol yes major marketing problem, likely a good idea. likely…
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Josh Litchman pfp
Josh Litchman
@joshlitchman
If we learned anything from Rick and Morty, yes. Terrible name.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction