mk
@mk
I remember when the left was pro- privacy and free speech.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Nicola Ceornea - ethOS
@nc
free speech absolutists do not exist. The only thing that changes when Overton window shifts is who does the censoring.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
mk
@mk
I agree with this. However, in the US, the left used to hold the view: “I do not agree with what you say, but I defend your right to say it.” It was a tenant of the left that free speech is critical to a free society. Free speech mustn’t be absolute to be important and worth fighting for.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Luciano
@luciano
I would generally say left still agrees with this but may not feel like it because the minority of people who don’t are much louder
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mk
@mk
I’d love to think so. But for example, I don’t know many that would agree with me that the right of neo-nazis to parade must be protected. That used to be a no-brainer.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Luciano
@luciano
Our ability to believe and say whatever we want isn’t in question imo It’s our ability to publicly influence other’s that is being restricted (by the community) Neo Nazi’s are still allowed to practice ofc but is it unamerican to collectively decide who should be allowed to publicly parade around our communit
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Brent Fitzgerald
@bf
Weird, I don’t recall it ever being a no-brainer. Paradox of tolerance.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
didnt make it
@novack
This is still the view held by most Democratic politicians and most people who vote for Democrats. The right is conflating free speech with free reach & free praise and it’s dumb. Publishers can choose not to publish nazi material and politicians can condemn nazi material without infringing on free speech.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
