No crypto application is more enhanced by AI than Prediction Markets.

The things we will ship this year were truly impossible before now.

2025 is the year of Truemarkets.

2025 will be a huge year for Apps enabled by AI.

Things that were legitimately infeasible before are possible now.

There has never been a better time to be building crypto apps.

Just skimmed thru the docs, aside from the oracle design (obviously a big difference) and "fair launch" token, are there any other differences between truemarkets and existing prediction markets that I should know about?

The enshrined oracle is a huge piece, it is the main differentiator.

Polymarket has had many issues in the past due to their set up.

We also have more onchain components; everything from the market question to rules and disputes are committed onchain in strings.

Biggest rule fight in the history of Polymarket is brewing, and will come to a head in the next few hours. 

The Ethereum ETF market has $11m in volume. The market is 5x larger than the previous biggest rules fight (the missing submarine being located). That disparity will only… https://t.co/NmjBLkAsLp

The biggest issue here is the inconsistency in precedent setting.

If Polymarket were to avoid any clarifications, it would ultimately be better, but it's as if their "clarifications" are really just projections of oracle insecurity (perhaps justifiably).

Below there are two… https://t.co/mwrpZH3mmw

MilliΞ

/ethereum foundation | opinions are my own but more than likely they come from Vitalik's blog paragraph.xyz/@chaskin

The enshrined oracle is a huge piece, it is the main differentiator.

Polymarket has had many issues in the past due to their set up.

We also have more onchain components; everything from the market question to rules and disputes are committed onchain in strings.

https://x.com/llamaonthebrink/status/1873198251702149556?s=46&t=sAmY0w7e6nKL7-0rZregKA

Gracias mucho

How do you plan on fixing the poorly worded definitions like gov shutdown and eth etf?

In those cases the wording wasn’t really the issue, it was the lack of onchain due process that was problematic.

There’s always room for improvement with market definitions, the problem  I was highlighting in that post was the contradictory precedent.

Ian average person would look at a market then make a reasonable assessment, in their case they decided to provide clarifications for one market but not the other, mostly because they felt insecure about the oracle (it’s far too arbitrary).

can say more pls I'm confused, based on your post you made it sound it based on the definitions they technically resolved to the result set in the definition however it's against what the normal person would think when they saw the title for the market

I'm confused how that isn't a problem with the definition?