Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑ pfp
mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑
@mikedemarais.eth
could an L2 (or L3) charge an exit penalty on assets being withdrawn thru the canonical bridge contract? or is the concept always subvertable by third party bridges ?
11 replies
2 recasts
24 reactions
Midas Whale 👑🐳 🎩 pfp
Midas Whale 👑🐳 🎩
@midaswhale
even if it was possible, I can't imagine people would continue to use such an extractive L2 (or L3) for very long.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nelson pfp
Nelson
@nelsonmckey
A true rollup would allow forced inclusion back to L1 even if a sequencer was censoring, but I’m sure you could create a hybrid validium that essentially uses a honeypot contract or one way native bridge model to create this. You’re thinking of a new form of money game?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Peter Watts pfp
Peter Watts
@pw
3rd party bridges often need to use the canonical bridge under the hood for liquidity, so can’t really subvert
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox pfp
Matthew Fox
@matthewfox
third party bridges are usually just relayers either side no? So I feel like the answer is yes but in doing so you incentivize the above
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Emmanuel🦉⌐◨-◨🎩🍥 pfp
Emmanuel🦉⌐◨-◨🎩🍥
@emmanuel
they can. ideally, this is something made known to users prior to their initial entry.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Marc Boiron pfp
Marc Boiron
@0xmarcb
Sure, you’d build this natively into the bridge contract.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zoo pfp
zoo
@zoo
couldnt blast kinda do this by withholding yield on staked eth?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ayush pfp
Ayush
@ayushm.eth
i think the only difference b/w canonical and non-canonical bridges would be the ability to mint new native tokens on the L2, so will likely run into liquidity issues?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mark Hilgenberg pfp
Mark Hilgenberg
@hilgi
Carrots may work better than sticks. Figure out a way to incentivise people for leaving their assets on the chain.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Defi Beats pfp
Defi Beats
@defi-beats
I think layer zero bridges would circumvent this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mm4 pfp
Mm4
@mm4
Impossible is nothing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction