the only way to truly verify the authenticity of a photo is to mint at the point of capture.

embedding wallets into cameras can assure that the metadata—including device, location, timestamps, etc.— is recorded onchain before it's edited.

the only way to truly verify the authenticity of a photo is to mint at the point of capture.

embedding wallets into cameras can assure that the metadata—including device, location, timestamps, etc.— is recorded onchain before it's edited.

https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x5abf0c04ab7196e2bdd19313b479baebd9f7791b/128

Proof of Location onchain 🫧⛓️
Built on the Optimism Stack 🔴
Join the /foam channel 

The image sensor needs to sign the capture fr. And the you need verifiable proof of location as the cherry on top, maybe via @foamspace 

And you need the provenance of any use of that media further down the editing chain to be verifiable - because raw photos aren’t what the public sees.

Known for the everywhere.computer (/ec), /unglish (unglish.co.uk), the /secure-design WG, WalletUncon, Causal Islands + drumming in all-genre power trios.

> because raw photos aren't what the public sees
That's right 💯. You need a way to maintain the integrity of edited photos and hence minting at capture is not the complete solution. This is something we are building at @0xmayaprotocol using applied cryptographic techniques (zk-proofs etc).