Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
What is the steelman argument for why Trump is less likely to lead the US into war?
6 replies
6 recasts
15 reactions
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
He's so motivated to enrich himself personally that he never jeopardize any of his overseas business deals by getting into an armed conflict. I don't actually believe this, but it's the best I could come up with. I could absolutely see him getting us into a war.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Chainleft
@chainleft
If there is any, it's because Dems are formed of warhawks and they're so warmongering that Trump seems less likely. But I don't think that's the case. They're both equally likely.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Caden
@cbxm
he's invested in real estate, not weapon manufacturing (maybe?), so property damage is not profitable for him he's chummy with the bad guys, but the US isn't aligned enough with them to actually join up, so instead of taking action, he'll sideline and grandstand about how the US has to put itself first far more likely to have a backroom deal about standing down so Russia/China/Iran can be the aggressor
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴
@highplains66
He keeps war hawks all over his cabinet, however, if he gets elected; that's two times he's entered the govt and the US is already in 2 wars! The US can only war so much. He wouldn't start another hopefully but who knows. Also the prior two conflicts in his last term lasted for his entire term, they didn't stop until after he left.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
One might argue that Elon would use whatever influence he gained by playing a decisive role in his victory to prevent it from happening. cc @aviationdoctor.eth
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Fran d’Amore
@ffran
no incentive
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
