Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
This take was so good I had to quote cast it twice We need a term like “schlep blindness” (https://paulgraham.com/schlep.html) for the crypto condition / the blind spot for non-speculative products — maybe “spec blindness”, but feels too on the nose In before @kia tells me speculation is good, actually
4 replies
3 recasts
20 reactions
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Can you paraphrase how you read that cast and the important insight? People seem impressed but it’s just word salad to me.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Broken down: - crypto is aware of meaningful use cases needed to leverage latent infra - but it suffers from 1) lack of funding for non-speculative use cases because they don't return money quickly 2) capital having agglomerated already in the hands of would be builders, letting them retire early / other folks in the space incapable of building long-term - the irony is that in a capital-rich environment, we can't find the other resources - doubly ironic because of the purported ethos of building in the open with composable / modular tools The insight is that being resource abundant in one form (capital) came at a very real cost on other fronts (talent, purpose, etc) because that resource was poorly / unevenly distributed from the get-go I may have read this wrong though, @lght.eth is poetic and the beauty is that you can interpret his words in multiple ways
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
