Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
can we change bio from "web3" to "onchain"? Feel like playing the iterative number versioning game might be -EV for the space at large The unlocks here are net-new and deserve net-new naming conventions Also prevents other things attaching themselves to a narrative or the inevitable "buh wah bou Web4 doe"
8 replies
2 recasts
10 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
absolute speed demon @javabu.eth
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Jared 🎩
@javabu.eth
Done. Thank you for the suggestion. You'll get tomorrow's tips.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jared 🎩
@javabu.eth
7331 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rani
@4484
i swear i think about this every single day. web3 = web2 wrapper. which is borderline bizarre considering.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
▫️Onyx 📚🎩
@cipherscript.eth
changing 'web3' to 'onchain' would be great. but we might want to consider how accessible this terminology is to those outside the crypto space. normies are usual averse of tech terminology I find, no?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
eggman 🔵
@eggman.eth
Yeah, I always considered web3.0 to be the age of unfettered API access, until Cambridge analytica and the likes ruined that for everyone. On-chain is a much better term for it. ..Just anything that's not that "web5.0" crap that went around in the 21 cycle peak.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
yes, we can!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
LONO 🎩🐹
@lono.eth
Ya def time to jettison "Web3." Idk how I feel about on chain but it is certainly better than "web3"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
