Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
it is WILD to me that we only have allowlists for minting and NOT for secondary sales. that’s not how the trading of art, luxury goods, family heirlooms, homes, even surfboards works. most secondary marketplaces IRL have a curation layer to filter buyers. this is why NFT marketplaces lose volume to private txns :)
18 replies
11 recasts
93 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
/highlight just shipped this (kind of) https://warpcast.com/rekdaus/0x1a027123 I have mixed feelings about its implementation being adjustable post mint but the idea is cool if communicated upfront But this also just exposed that any creator can rug their highlight collection anytime 🙃
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Nat Emodi
@emodi
what’s the concern?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
that a creator can change this post sale and the buyer isn't made aware ahead of purchase even a flag that this is possible would be nice kinda like opensea has "metadata frozen or not" but this is far more severe imo losing the independence to sell to who ever you like for something you bought erks me
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
imo that could be perceived as an anti-creator take. if i'm following you correctly, look at taylor swift vs scooter braun. you would argue that scooter braun should have more authority over who gets rights to taylor's studio albums than taylor herself. wow. i'm on team taylor.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
I mean the real villain here is Big Machine Records
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
pro-consumer forever and always 💜
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
nah, agree to disagree. taylor swift turned lemons into lemonade because her insane fandom and empire, but don't forget all of the smaller artists who get absolutely ruined and wrecked when this happens to them.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
