Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Barabander
@dbarabander
About 6 months ago I read a summary of a 2nd Circuit case where the court held that Binance was subject to the U.S. securities laws, in part, because it used AWS instances in California. My immediate reaction was that I misread the summary. I reread it; nope, I read it correctly. I then assumed the author made a mistake, so I read the opinion myself. Nope again, server locations were core to the court's reasoning. This sent me down a rabbit hole. How could the location of a server be so important? So I read every crypto x securities x jurisdictional scope case I could find to try and understand. I became obsessed. Today I'm excited to publish with @jchervinsky the fruits of this obsession. We've distilled everything we learned by reviewing tons of case law and regulatory enforcement actions into a Practical Guide to Geofencing for crypto companies. I hope you enjoy. Check it out here: https://variant.fund/articles/practical-guide-to-geofencing/
3 replies
6 recasts
32 reactions
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
excellent work, thank you
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
