matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
I’ve seen criticism on here and twitter, as well as some euphoria on the flip side. I don’t think anyone thinks that the token distribution is good or that it’s some wonderful meaningful project. it feels gross and grifty. I think most positive or neutral voices are simply excited that crypto is center stage among the concerns of the incoming administration, as opposed to being unfairly targeted by politically motivated enforcement actions that haven’t solved much of anything (e.g. FTX allowed to happen, Coinbase taken to court). in addition to euphoria from number go up, the desire for regulatory clarity is what’s coming through here imo. it’s unfortunate that this progress has resulted in some questionable alliances along the way.
7 replies
9 recasts
68 reactions

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
There’s a lot of nuance here. We should probably get comfortable in the gray areas. https://warpcast.com/nounishprof/0x9113443a
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
totally, it’s definitely a mixed bag. can’t say that I’m particularly happy with crypto becoming increasingly married to one political party. I think that’s a mistake long-term. but hey, whatever we have now is objectively better than an admin trying to destroy the industry. so at least there’s that.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

D-wayñe  🎩🕴 pfp
D-wayñe 🎩🕴
@drrrner
This is my concern and fear
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction