Matthew
@matthew
trying a screenshot framework! how I'd (generously) define the two sides of the idealogical split I see playing out today in America. What do you think? What did I miss / what would you change?
8 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Vinay Débrou ⚙️
@vinaydebrou.eth
this was written by chatgpt?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
by these definitions i am both a disciple in the church of the based, and a monk in the temple of the woke very well then, i contain multitudes
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
links 🏴
@links
Interesting comparison. Although I don’t really like the American tendency to split everything into two groups. Even based on your comparison, these groups have a lot in common. Both are challenging the current zeitgeist, for instance instance.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
🗿
@bias
I would say being based doesn’t automatically mean you respect history and cultural norms as anchors—if the history and norms are whack, a based person says “fuck off.” to the whack.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Woke measures by Words Based measures by Deeds
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sally
@sallyh
Church of based : 1 & 4 are a bit contradictory no? Where do they get their ‘tangible facts’ from if not institutions or experts who are authority’s in their topic? Could these two lists be not so much left / right but just two out of many ideologies currently existing?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
If church of based is the right, I don’t see it playing out like that at all. Grounded in reality? Lol that’s definitely not the case. It seems like this split is more like center left & center right. Or Libertarian left & right. But the far right & left are much more extreme.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kailash
@kailash
Complementing this with demographics could be interesting
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
