Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
raw thoughts on the new direction: - I think it'll push channels to develop their own unique identities - I like splitting up hosts / members / followers and making it clear in the UI who is in / out. helps curate the vibe and give credit to contributors. - more ppl will cast w/o a channel now and that is better. reduces "where to cast this" decision fatigue. fewer steps -> easier to cast -> more casts it'll take work and friction to retrain the userbase, but I think this a strongly positive move. Right now channels are trying to be two things at once, better to pick one and go with it.
6 replies
16 recasts
25 reactions
binocularsXL🚀
@binocularsx
I also like that tokengating can be implemented
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
law
@traguy.eth
I’m just worried about visibility, Matthew Visibility. Idl how that will be, going forward.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Just Build
@justbuild
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 81 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
i agree, after our last conversation, and these updates i like the idea now the only issue i have is this. should replies be open to everyone or just channel members? what do you think https://warpcast.com/fwkiraa.eth/0xddb88361
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
bradq
@bradq
good thoughts. the only thing that bothers me a bit is that replies and closed to members. completely get the moxie reply issue but feels like opportunity for engagement in good stuff will be harder for those still finding their way on FC.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Disky.eth 🎩
@disky.eth
These UI update suggestions remind me of reddit a bit. Would you add the ‘tag’ next to someones name in a channel? Similar to discord?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
