Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
raw thoughts on the new direction: - I think it'll push channels to develop their own unique identities - I like splitting up hosts / members / followers and making it clear in the UI who is in / out. helps curate the vibe and give credit to contributors. - more ppl will cast w/o a channel now and that is better. reduces "where to cast this" decision fatigue. fewer steps -> easier to cast -> more casts it'll take work and friction to retrain the userbase, but I think this a strongly positive move. Right now channels are trying to be two things at once, better to pick one and go with it.
8 replies
1 recast
26 reactions

bradq   pfp
bradq
@bradq
good thoughts. the only thing that bothers me a bit is that replies and closed to members. completely get the moxie reply issue but feels like opportunity for engagement in good stuff will be harder for those still finding their way on FC.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
what's the moxie reply issue? I think the team will react quickly / iterate on how to show replies. also am not entirely sure how I feel about it, bc on the one hand you do want some way for new ppl to jump in, on the other you want to curate. but I'm sure there's a good middle ground.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction