Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
Can anyone help me figure out what would the FIP-1 canonical URL look like for a purple proposal? for example proposal 52 has the id 0xafc452f09668a1f527aa6c3516fae0df9dc692b61fcbdf2af2c37ab631d03dc6 https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/72
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions

Neokry pfp
Neokry
@neokry
it doesn’t really exist yet as far as I know
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
Any ideas on how you’d structure it? I think you’re right, no one’s done it yet. Also tagging @v in case he has thoughts. I’m thinking [chain_id]/[governance_contract]/[proposal_id]
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
its based on CAIP-19 which specifies that the URI has to include a finalized "asset namespace", like erc721 or erc1155 for NFTs I don't think there is an ERC for governance contracts so might have to come up with something new
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

alex pfp
alex
@alexgrover.eth
Out of curiosity what are you looking to do? Given that there’s no standard here, it seems like the nouns.build link should be the canonical one. There’s no guarantee that other daos will have the same interface
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction