Farcaster

Can anyone help me figure out what would the FIP-1 canonical URL look like for a purple proposal?

for example proposal 52 has the id 0xafc452f09668a1f527aa6c3516fae0df9dc692b61fcbdf2af2c37ab631d03dc6

Can anyone help me figure out what would the FIP-1 canonical URL look like for a purple proposal?

for example proposal 52 has the id 0xafc452f09668a1f527aa6c3516fae0df9dc692b61fcbdf2af2c37ab631d03dc6

https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/72

design @splits | /wireframe /latenightcrew /event-pass /feud

it doesn’t really exist yet as far as I know

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

https://material.work


prev: https://persistence.wtf / https://nouns.build

Any ideas on how you’d structure it? I think you’re right, no one’s done it yet. Also tagging @v in case he has thoughts.

I’m thinking [chain_id]/[governance_contract]/[proposal_id]

its based on CAIP-19 which specifies that the URI has to include a finalized "asset namespace", like erc721 or erc1155 for NFTs

I don't think there is an ERC for governance contracts so might have to come up with something new

I like baking /goodbread and building apps on web3 protocols. DevRel @ ENS Labs. gregskril.com

it should include one more identifier or else it's just a more generic CAIP-19. So at least something like:

[chain_id]/governor:[governance_contract_address]/[proposal_id]

but that's not great either because there could be more than 1 time of governor - hence why CAIP-19 says it needs an ERC number 😅

any thoughts on what you'd do for a new schema? was thinking [chain_id]/[governance_contract_address]/[proposal_id]