Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
As far as I can tell the Icon of the Seas is basically fine; even on the environmental front (important!) I see no reason to believe it's worse per passenger than other ships. A lot of opposition to it feels like elite snobbery against middle / upper-middle-class people. Any good anti-Icon arguments I'm missing?
4 replies
24 recasts
302 reactions

Matt Garcia pfp
Matt Garcia
@mattgarcia.eth
something people don't consider about environmental impact is the splurge—"My 25-room mansion is eco friendly so I'm eco friendly." even if you're using econfriendly methods in your gigantic non-essential-thing (mansion,vegas casino,mega cruise...), your splurge footprint (resources, labor, land) is not eco friendly
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Matt Garcia pfp
Matt Garcia
@mattgarcia.eth
and i say this as a someone who thinks environmental impact is a very secondary factor when judging human endeavours i just find the 'splurge' contradiction in the people who care quite striking
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Freddy Mertens pfp
Freddy Mertens
@freddymertens
More people per boat = Less waste per person
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction