Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mattdesl pfp
mattdesl
@mattdesl
spam filtering with ML seems risky! and moves casts toward the mysterious algo-ranking that content creators have come to loathe on Twitter/IG (ie: no links or no to certain patterns). then again, there are few options and it will probably mostly cut down on spam/noise replies. tough problem to solve…
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

mattdesl pfp
mattdesl
@mattdesl
would be nice to have some place where users could opt in or out of strictness, models, community supported accounts, etc. some of the weird but fun parts of Twitter look a bit like spam to an AI…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Andrei O. pfp
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
If the model and training data are open, then it seems like no trust is lost. But I fear it will be "sufficiently" open, which, in reality, means fully closed.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Have you tried /nook
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

John Camkiran pfp
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
It’s a catch 22
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction