Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
The spam algorithm went on a rampage this weekend. Channel changes are imminent. What should be be doing this week to prepare? How can you avoid the spam label for the next week? Let’s talk about it on the State of the Union call. All are welcome. RSVP and you’ll get the link for the recording!
22 replies
20 recasts
48 reactions

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
I wonder how much of this has to do with Moxie, both from a spam-labeled users’s standpoint (maybe over-replying without reciprocation by the original caster) and the original caster (maybe hesitating to reply due to Moxie implications). It does seem odd that we saw such an uptick in the number of spam labels.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
I’m being farmed hard and I’m ignoring low effort replies that I can’t easily see the context in my notifications.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
Others have taken a similar approach recently too (myself included), and that’s sort of my point. I feel like it’s helping weed out a lot of actual spammers, and unfortunately some legitimate users are getting caught up in it as well.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
I’m casting about it constantly. I don’t know what else to do.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
Yeah, you’ve done more than your part to raise awareness. I feel like it’s up to each individual now to consider the potential implications/consequences anytime they reply. It’s unfortunate it has to be that way, but until there’s a better way of reliably differentiating bots/intentional spam, maybe there is no other choice? Regardless, it’s sort of an awkward place to be in.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction