Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
The UX of betting is pretty bad imo No matter how many times I ask friends to explain it to me, I can’t get myself to intuitively understand what -220 means
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Imo, this is a good thing. Because it prevents people from betting money on shit they don’t really understand to begin with.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
Yeah except I’m sure these companies have already optimized for weaseling people out of their money so maybe it’s designed to be somewhat opaque on purpose?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
I generally follow this, especially for individuals, but for organizations that are incentivized to design addictive behavior I’ll choose malice
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
I dunno. Even the UX to fund your wallet is janky. I think it’s just easy to make money when you run a functional prediction market with trusted contracts on a low fee network in a world full of people starved of high defi yields and NFT froth.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
Oh I was talking about the sports betting apps mainly Polymarket I’ll chalk up to inexperience
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Also, if Polymarket addressed some pretty straightforward low hanging fruit UX-wise, I wonder if that would make quality of the predictions greater or lesser. Like, does filtering people willing to put up with wallet busy work and confusing betting flows result in more informed guesses?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Ohhhh. Dark patterns abound there for sure.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction